Guantanamo detainee details CIA torture techniques in court

بقلم: Ed Newman
2021-10-29 13:12:34

Pinterest
Telegram
Linkedin
WhatsApp

Miami, October 29 (RHC)-- A detainee held at the Guantanamo Bay detention centre has offered the first public account in a United States court, of torture at a CIA clandestine facility during Washington’s decades-long so-called “war on terror.”

Majid Khan, a former resident of a Baltimore suburb, detailed being waterboarded, physically and sexually abused, and suffering other forms of torment at a CIA “black site”, used by the US in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Thursday’s testimony from Khan, which came during a war crimes tribunal sentencing hearing at the U.S. base in Cuba, represents the first time a former “black site” detainee has publicly described abuses committed as part of the U.S. spy agency’s so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”, according to the New York Times.

Khan had previous pleaded guilty to charges related to his role as an al-Qaeda courier and planner.  “I thought I was going to die,” Khan said during the testimony, detailing various tortuous techniques, including being suspended naked from a ceiling beam for long periods, being doused repeatedly with ice water to keep him awake for days, and having his head held underwater to the point of near-drowning, only to have water poured into his nose and mouth when the interrogators let him up.

Khan said that during his approximately three years being held at CIA sites, he was beaten, given forced enemas, sexually assaulted and starved. He was transferred to the US military detention centre in Cuba in September 2006.

“I would beg them to stop and swear to them that I didn’t know anything,” he said.  “If I had intelligence to give I would have given it already but I didn’t have anything to give.”

While some of Khan’s treatment had previously been detailed in a 2014 US Senate Intelligence Committee report – which accused the CIA of going far beyond its legal boundaries as it sought to extract information about al-Qaeda – public personal accounts from high-level detainees have been virtually non-existent.

“The more I cooperated and told them, the more I was tortured,” Khan told the court in apparent accordance with the Senate intelligence report conclusion that the conduct by U.S. agents was not only inhumane, but often ineffective.

Rights monitors have continued to call for accountability for the abuses committed at the secret sites, with UN Special Rapporteur on torture, Nils Melzer, saying in 2017 the conduct was in “clear violation of the Convention against Torture and is sending a dangerous message of complacency and impunity to officials in the U.S. and around the world.”

They have also increasingly urged U.S. President Joe Biden to end indefinite detentions at Guantanamo, something his previous boss, former President Barack Obama, had vowed and failed to do.

Khan, reading from a 39-page statement, spoke on the first day in what is expected to be a two-day hearing.  He pleaded guilty in February 2012 to charges that include conspiracy, murder and providing material support to “terrorism”.

A panel of military officers selected by a Pentagon legal official – known as a convening authority – is set to sentence Khan to between 25 and 40 years in prison.  However, he will serve far less because of his extensive cooperation with U.S. authorities, including in the case against the five men currently being held at Guantanamo who are charged with planning and providing logistical support for the 9/11 attacks.

Under the plea deal, which the jurors were not told about, Khan’s sentence by the jury will be reduced to no more than 11 years by the convening authority, and he will get credit for his time in custody since his February 2012 guilty plea.

That means he should be released early next year, resettled in a third, as yet unknown, country because he cannot return to Pakistan, where he has citizenship.



التعليق

  • David Wade's gravatar
    David Wade
    29/10/2021 03:32 pm

    One possible reason that no US President has been able to close the Guantanamo concentration camp is because no US President has sufficient power to do so. The US military get $800 billion per year, stolen from US taxpayers by Washington, DC, politicians., with no questions asked. No DC politician has the "balls" to challenge the US military (after all, the military has the guns), and most politicians fall all over themselves trying to give the military more than their $800 billion annual payoff. So, the US has an out-of-control military that ignores DC politicians and US taxpayers, and carries out its own agenda. But who sets that agenda? If its not US politicians, who can it be? I think we all know the answer to that question.


أترك تعليقا
الجميع مطلوبة
لم يتم نشره
captcha challenge
فيما يلي
  • Árabe
  • Creole
  • Inglés

الأكثر قراءة

up